Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

The hunt is On.
Sponsored by
Can you track down Scotland's wildest beastie?

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

'No-frills terminals' for budget airlines



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 24 December 2006
MAJOR airports across Europe are set to get 'budget terminals' to allow low-cost airlines to fly into the larger city airports.
The European Commission is to launch a strategy next month which will aim to encourage the building of stripped-down facilities at airports such as Edinburgh and Aberdeen, as well as major European hubs such as Frankfurt and Paris Charles de Gaulle.


At present, many low-cost carriers fly to smaller regional airports which are a long way from city centres. Examples include the Frankfurt-Hahn airport used by Ryanair, which is 81 miles from the city and lies in a different German state, and Skavsta airport which serves Stockholm but is 60 miles south of the Swedish capital. Budget carriers opt for the smaller airports because they can negotiate lower landing charges there than at major terminals.

The Commission will propose the move next month in a paper that was originally planned for publication last week, along with proposals for emissions trading among carriers.

A Brussels source said: "The proposal is part of a directive on airport charges, but it has been delayed until January for translation reasons.

"It would be directed at having airports build terminals with limited facilities and charge carriers less to use it."

Such a plan has already been brought in at Glasgow Airport, which last year opened a special 'no frills' terminal for low-cost carriers such as easyJet and FlyGlobespan, the Scottish-based budget carrier.

In contrast to 'traditional' terminals, these facilities do away with seating, shops and cafés and cost the airline less to use. If customers want to get food or drink or do some shopping, then they must go to other parts of the airport, for example near or after the security gates.

The biggest boost for Scottish customers is likely to come in the way of more no-frills flights from Edinburgh and Aberdeen as well as more airports abroad with better connections to city centres.

Airport companies have welcomed the idea of different services and charges for budget carriers as a way of raising raise cash to pay for the forecast increase in air traffic.



The full article contains 385 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 23 December 2006 8:08 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Budget airlines
 
1

Androsthenes,

Edinburgh 24/12/2006 02:25:59

Does this mean that Edinburgh isn't already a 'stripped down' facility?
Try getting a drink of water without paying £1.40 for a small bottle......

2

Danny Mather,

Comiston 24/12/2006 08:27:30

perhaps this stripped down facility could be built at Turnhouse. So at least it will have a rail link built in.

3

Joe,

Livingston 24/12/2006 08:29:54

Edinburgh is a stripped-down facility, stripped of regular large aircraft facilities. Interesting to note that
easyjet chose Edinburgh recently despite it not having a a special 'no frills' terminal. Airlines it seems will pay for an airport's accessibility/popularity?

4

Joe,

Livingston 24/12/2006 08:35:27

#2 Turnhouse is 20 minutes from the airport,. What next, a directive that stations must be in-house?

5

Danny Mather,

Comiston 24/12/2006 09:37:04

#4 20 minutes by what stretch of the imagination? It is on on the airport perimeter. There used to be a rail halt there that served the golf club and indeed the old terminal buildings. Siting a low cost terminal there would have the advantage of a road connection & a rail connection in situ. It's hardly rocket science

6

Callum,

Edinburgh 24/12/2006 11:39:27

I welcome the news that A low-cost Terminal building at Edinburgh it would mean more low-cost flights.

7

Joe,

Livingston 24/12/2006 12:02:48

Turnhouse is not on the main west coast line, I fail to see how a low-cost terminal will work only serving half of Scotland?
20 minutes? Try motoring from Turnhouse around to Ingliston behind a couple of artics negoitiating the Maybury lights.?


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.