Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Sunday, 30th November 2008 Change Date

The Scotsman Digital Archive - Special Christmas Offer

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Royal Mail row deepens over 'horrific' plan to insulate private investors



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 31 August 2008
THE row over the private sector's involvement in Royal Mail will step up a gear this week when Postcomm presses the Government to reassure investors they won't be responsible for the service's £3.4bn pensions black hole.
But postal unions have already lambasted the proposal as allowing the private sector to cherry-pick the profitable parts of the service while leaving postal workers uncertain about their retirements.

Nigel Stapleton, chairman of the postal regulat
or, will argue that the Government should encourage private investment in the service by reassuring potential buyers they would not assume liability for its gaping pensions deficit. According to the last estimate, Royal Mail's pensions deficit stands at £3.4bn, but that figure is expected to be revised substantially upwards when the latest valuation is revealed next month. Some estimates suggest it may have more than doubled to £7bn.

Analysts say the pensions problem would make it extremely difficult for the Royal Mail to attract the private investment both Postcomm and its own management say it needs to modernise.

In an interview with Scotland on Sunday ahead of a visit to the Scottish Parliament this week, Stapleton said the pensions black hole was amassed during the 1980s and 1990s, and has nothing to do with its current operations. He said it is standard practice in the private sector when firms buy a stake in another firm that they do not automatically assume liability for historical problems.

The Royal Mail should not be an exception, he argued.

"Usually the new owner does not take on those liabilities," he said. "If the Government was to make the decision to offer a stake in the Royal Mail, then something would have to be done to make sure the owner does not take on those (pensions] liabilities."

Stapleton is seeking to widen support for the part privatisation of the Royal Mail after Postcomm recommended in May that it should be allowed to raise external capital – a model that has been tried and tested in several other European countries. In the same month, Royal Mail made its own plea to issue shares.

But unions last night dismissed Stapleton's proposal as a "horrific" example of allowing the private sector to invest in the profitable parts of the business, while leaving the state to struggle with its debts.

A spokeswoman for the Communication Workers Union said: "Pensions are a crucial part of workers' benefits. All companies, including Royal Mail, have an obligation to their workforce to uphold their agreed terms and conditions, especially pensions. We expect employers in the mail industry to provide decent pay and working conditions for postal workers and not use competition as an excuse to undercut their terms or reduce pension provision."

She claimed the reason that Royal Mail is labouring under such severe problems – it posted a loss of £279m in May – is due to Postcomm's decision to open the market up to competition ahead of the rest of Europe, and for setting "incredibly low" tariffs for the "final mile", the stage where post is delivered.

Private companies, such as TNT Post and Business Post, have set up profitable businesses collecting bulk mail from businesses, but use the Royal Mail for the final stage of delivery. Postcomm decides the tariffs for this final stage, and the CWU argues that the prices set are putting Royal Mail's competitors at an advantage.

But Stapleton will this week seek to persuade Scottish ministers and businesses that the liberalisation of the market is not the root cause of the postal service and Post Office network's demise.

He argued that the single biggest reason for the fall in mail volumes has been the digital revolution, as people switch to sending e-mails rather than letters.

"That is removing value from the Royal Mail to a greater extent than Royal Mail is losing value to new mail competitors," he said.

The Government is preparing to publish the results of the Hooper review into the future of Royal Mail in October.





The full article contains 676 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 30 August 2008 2:22 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Pensions
 
1

Epicuras,

31/08/2008 13:58:45
the current and previous governments have done everything possible to change the royal mail from a profit making public 'utility' onto a loss maker so the most attractive profit making sections can be flogged off/given away to the private sector for the purely political neo-conservative aim of the uk becoming the first private-sector owned country, for their own personal financial and political benefit. this is just another step along that path
2

Alan B,

31/08/2008 17:39:09
Labour have been irresponsible allowing this pension deficit. All pension liabilities should be fully funded.
3

Alan B,

31/08/2008 17:42:22
#Epicuras

Can you justify any of that?

Lets face it most mail, is business mail. And we all have to endure junk mail that the government should outlaw.

Few of us would ever post a letter now a days. The only time anyone would ever use mail is at xmas.

What is the advantage of having a monopoly supplier for packages etc?

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.