Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Sunday, 30th November 2008 Change Date

The Scotsman Digital Archive - Special Christmas Offer

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Terry Murden: Lloyds TSB back in bad books over uncertainty surrounding Scottish Widows



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 29 June 2008
JUST when Lloyds TSB had got itself back into everybody's good books we're faced with fresh uncertainty over its Scottish Widows subsidiary.
The company is believed to be eyeing opportunities in Europe, with one theory being a move to take Dresdner from German group Allianz in exchange for the Edinburgh-based Widows.

While Lloyds could retain a link through a distribution arrangement,
it does look a little unlikely. After the pounding the bank got over the price it paid for Widows and its subsequent under-performance, it has invested heavily in turning it round so that it now contributes handsomely to the group's bottom line.

The bank could argue that it is now an attractive proposition for a prospective acquirer, but it would undermine the determined efforts made to stress its importance to the Lloyds TSB group.

What's more, the City likes Widows and therefore has rekindled its affection for the parent. The commercial arguments also appear flaky. There are no obvious cost synergies as there are no overlaps between Lloyds and Dresdner. The German bank isn't even that highly rated on its home territory.

Lloyds wasn't giving much away last week, neither denying the gossip nor providing any pointers to its plans for Widows. The staff are understandably nervous and have demanded answers. It is to be hoped the company makes its plans clear quite soon.

Hotel plan is nothing short of a disgrace
Edinburgh city councillors should hang their heads in shame for approving plans to build a 17-storey hotel in the Haymarket area that will blight the skyline and ruin views of the Castle. Last week's decision was a truly disgraceful move by those who should be protecting a world heritage city and have chosen instead to condemn it.

This monstrous and oversized development, which looks like a spaceship, will indeed be truly alien to a city whose good fortune is built on its handsome appearance. One of the great attractions of the route into Edinburgh, particularly on the Corstorphine approach, is that nothing obscures views of the Castle across the residential rooftops, not even Murrayfield Stadium which is virtually invisible for most of the journey.

Like the chain stores that robbed some of England's prettiest towns of their local character and beauty, we can soon expect Tiger Developments, Intercontinental and Travelodge to destroy a much loved and envied vista that is so rare in Britain. The architect, Richard Murphy, compares the Cockburn Association's objections to the plans to those it lodged against the building of the Balmoral Hotel. That would be funny if it were not so idiotic. But it is also typical of an architectural profession that seems to be having a laugh at the rest of us along with local authority planners.

There is one last chance for Edinburgh to be rescued from its act of municipal vandalism if the Scottish Government can be persuaded to throw out this crazed project. Sadly, the approval of ministers is regarded as a formality.

As a member of the media I feel partly guilty for not campaigning against this scheme more vigorously. But as a show of strength with those who objected, anyone connected with this development, including suppliers and clients or through public relations and marketing, will be named and shamed in this column. The recklessness of those councillors who backed this scheme should be appropriately rewarded at the next local elections.

SMG changes name but TV remains a risk
SMG is changing its name, not surprisingly to STV as the company has stripped itself of any pretensions of being a media group. The switch was predicted here a year ago when it seemed an inevitable part of the transition from its previous multi-platform strategy of newspapers, radio, advertising and television.

Chief executive Rob Woodward arrived with determined plans to rebuild the company around its roots. Out goes the SMG moniker acquired in 1996 after the acquisition of the Glasgow Herald and Evening Times, and the new name unifies the company with its product. The change follows the sale of outdoor advertising business Primesight last year and Virgin Radio last month and coincides with a new online strategy.

But focusing on television remains a risky proposition, given the competitive pressures looming in the digital switchover.





The full article contains 724 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 28 June 2008 4:33 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Terry Murden
 
1

Buttress,

29/06/2008 11:15:13
The 17 storey hotel plan is a disgrace - but so is Caltongate. How about adding that to the 'naming and shaming'? Let's start with the support of the Chamber of Commerce, whose publicity rentagobs, especially Chief Executive Hewitt, have supported throughout the destruction of listed buildings and the appallingly poor quality development in the WHS. But who holds its property portfolio? Why Mountgrange of course. It stinks.

www.eh8.org.uk

Murphy and his remarks about the Cockburn and the Balmoral - what it objected to was the proposed height of the clock tower, which it felt would spoil views of the castle, and so the height was duly reduced. At least the clock used to play a public function, that of ensuring the travelling public who didn't own pocket watches had some idea of the time.

The only function the alien spaceship will serve is to spoil the city. Edinburgh World Heritage objected also, and possibly you could start with naming and shaming Coun Lowrie, who serves on the Board of Directors of Edinburgh World Heritage, and yet who, as with Caltongate, voted against the best interest of the WHS and for the development. He should resign.

What about Alan Henderson, Chief Planner, who, despite EWH objecting, insisted this would ENHANCE the World Heritage Site, and ignored his own council's policies regarding heights in the WHS and its buffer zone? Possibly compterency procedures can stiil be brought, before he retires on a nice pension?




2

Buttress,

29/06/2008 11:46:35
CITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT QUALITY HANDBOOK

High Buildings
& Roofscape

“New development, which by reason of its height is likely to have an
adverse effect on the historic skyline of the city or on views into or out of
the centre, including landmark buildings and the traditional roofscape will
not be allowed.”

http://download.edinburgh.gov.uk/DQ_Guidelines/High_Buildings.pdf

3

Billy the Fish,

30/06/2008 19:33:51
THE SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT MUST INTERVENE TO STOP THIS SKYSCRAPER FROM DESTROYING EDINBURGH'S HISTORIC SKYLINE

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.