Scottish spending review: Kate Forbes is contorting herself to avoid accountability on job cuts

Kate Forbes has been set the unenviable task of simultaneously justifying her Government’s public spending priorities while claiming the cuts are not her fault.
Kate Forbes is under pressure to deliver a balanced budget amid a difficult financial outlook.Kate Forbes is under pressure to deliver a balanced budget amid a difficult financial outlook.
Kate Forbes is under pressure to deliver a balanced budget amid a difficult financial outlook.

This article contains affiliate links. We may earn a small commission on items purchased through this article, but that does not affect our editorial judgement.

SNP politicians are adept at this style of government. It is one where the successes are that of the Government and the failures usually the fault of Westminster or some incorrigible force.

This strategy of oppositional government is the cornerstone of any good nationalist politician, and the finance secretary certainly falls into that category when compared to some of her colleagues.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

The SNP/Green Government, in particular, likes to talk about mitigation of UK Government spending choices and choosing to spend more on areas such as social security to compensate.

But it is also a choice of the Government to cut, in the thousands, civil service jobs.

Read More
SNP government has two choices: embrace fantasy economics or face up to its hard...

It is an easy crutch for the finance secretary to lean on to blame the cuts in UK Government spending, but it is harder to point out exactly where those jobs will come from.

It is, after all, her decision on which parts of the public sector will lose their jobs.

The problem is this oppositional government approach often results in farce, such as when Ms Forbes said she refused to follow Westminster’s lead of setting “arbitrary targets” on the number of public sector job losses, only to then set an arbitrary target of “pre-pandemic levels”.

At a session of the finance committee on Tuesday, MSPs witnessed Ms Forbes contorting her answers to avoid giving certainty on where the axe may fall, all in the hope of avoiding accountability that would come with a firm number.

Blame for the cuts is much more easily apportioned to others if you are choosing to cut jobs in a “flexible” manner.

The closest we got to any inkling of where might suffer was when Ms Forbes confirmed health jobs would continue to grow, and admitted other areas would have to compensate.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

But the failure to clearly define and clearly set out where and when job cuts should be made is an attempt to pre-emptively pass the buck.

It undermines future accountability, allows for definitions to take on a distinctly post-modern quality, and for ministers to slip away from difficult questions.

Want to hear more from The Scotsman's politics team? Check out the latest episode of our political podcast, The Steamie.

It's available wherever you get your podcasts, including Apple Podcasts and Spotify.

Comments

 0 comments

Want to join the conversation? Please or to comment on this article.