Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

The hunt is On.
Sponsored by
Can you track down Scotland's wildest beastie?

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Tarnished hero spins a web of deceit



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
30 July 2006
ONE night during the Tour de France, Dave Zabriskie, an American riding with the CSC team, was making his way to his hotel room when he encountered Floyd Landis pacing the corridor. Landis was in a world of his own, oblivious to his countryman's presence. "I've got to win this bike race," he shouted to himself. "I've got to win this bike race."
Zabriskie thought it typical of Landis. A driven man, he was psyching himself up for the next day's stage.

The lengths to which Landis was prepared to go to win this bike race are now known. The sport of cycling has taken so many punches from the drug testers that you'd think it would be desensitised to scandal by now. The Festina Affair of 1998, Operation Puerto of 2006 and a heavy catalogue of disgrace and tragedy in between should have made people shock-proof, but still, when Landis's positive test for a performance-enhancer became known last week the cycling world reeled anew. It was instructive viewing.

After a miraculous performance on the killer mountain stage between Saint-Jean-de-Maurienne and Morzine on July 20, Landis was tested and the test came back with high traces of testosterone, an old favourite of those who take short cuts to glory. Only the terminally gullible will have been surprised by this. The day before the climb to Morzine, Landis cracked horribly on the ascent to La Toussuire. He lost bags of time to his rivals and was in such a state of distress at the end of the stage that some thought him incapable of continuing the Tour. Twenty-four hours later he produced arguably the most powerful surge in the history of the race. Even Lance Armstrong's eyes were popping. Many of his rivals said, in coded language, that they had never seen anything like it in their professional lives.

Later, Landis said that listening to Metallica records helped get him in the right frame of mind. A heavy dose of testosterone might have helped, too. His positive test was reported as cycling's shame last week. Throughout the world it was written that the game was discredited once more. Not true. What it was, in fact, was a key day in cycling's salvation. So often the lines are blurred. Landis has been exposed as a cheat. That, surely, is a good thing. The message sent to the next generation of bike riders is a powerful one. If they didn't know it already then they know now that the testers these days mean business.

'Take the drugs if you like but realise that we're coming to get you if you do.'

What was surprising about the Landis business was not that he tested positive but that so many people believed in him in the first place.

"In its best, most redemptive moments, sports will shine a light on the unbending and indomitable human spirit," wrote the Philadelphia Inquirer just before the news broke last week, "and in so doing repair our sad sense of innocence lost. Just about the time we have given in to despair, when all seems irreversibly soiled by the dopers and head-butters and steroid freaks, someone will happen along to cleanse and disinfect. That current someone is named Floyd Landis."

You would expect this from the American media. We're not slow in acclaiming false sporting gods in this part of the world but they bring it to another level across the water. They need their heroes more than most and in Landis they saw another Armstrong. But others bought into the fairy tale of the hero with the degenerative hip triumphing over excruciating pain to realise his life's dream.

Lance beat cancer. Floyd beat the bone-on-bone hurt of a hip that was likened to a lump of rotten wood. And he beat other things, too.

Raised in the small village of Farmersville, Pennsylvania he was brought up as a Mennonite Christian by God-fearing parents. As a kid he did without radio and television and computers, he went to church twice weekly and was always dressed conservatively. He rebelled. In Amish Country, it didn't take much to earn a reputation for wildness and a fondness for riding a bike did it for Floyd. His parents disapproved. When Floyd left home after high school they were mortified but he won them over.

In their yard at home the Landis's have two signs hanging. One says 'To God be the glory', the other, 'Floyd's the man'. No doubt they will keep believing in their boy's innocence but his tale of schmaltz doesn't wash with too many others. That it ever did is a wonder. But it does no longer. And for that we give thanks.

Time for Le Guen to take a deep breath


WITH the possible exception of Brazil there can be no country in world football where the rush to judgment is more hair-raisingly swift than it is in Scotland, or in the Old Firm to be exact. Rangers play their first competitive match under Paul Le Guen at Fir Park this afternoon, a venue that brings back certain memories of Gordon Strachan's early weeks as Celtic manager. You might remember that a few days after his team were ransacked of their dignity by Artmedia Bratislava they went to Motherwell and drew 4-4 in the opening game of the league season. Strachan was portrayed as a nincompoop at the time.

Le Guen will get more understanding from the Rangers fans than Strachan did - or does - from the Celtic supporters, but he'd be as well starting with a win today all the same. Round about 2pm he should take a very deep breath. And he should hold it - until May.

The full article contains 985 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 29 July 2006 9:03 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Tour de France
 
1

Keith,

California 30/07/2006 01:23:46

Since when is the media so adamant about drawing the verdict on someone when varitable evidence hasn't even been presented? The stance in this article is unjustified. Until all bases and all factors are acknowledged and proven facts are presented then who can point the finger. Landis may or may not have doped, and if he did, it may or may not have had an affect on his performance at the Tour this year. Either way, the issue will be resloved by the correct administrations and until then it is no place for anyone to jump to confounded verdicts in this case. At times I wonder if it really is drugs that may destroy the sport of cycling, or those who want to press their accusations through methods that are akin to tabloids and such trash.

2

Ugly American,

The place where heroes are needed 30/07/2006 02:11:57

So the people of the USA "need their heroes more than most." Fine. We're flawed. Despite those flaws, however, we gave the world the gift of "innocent until proven guilty." You might recall that we had to run away from Europe to do it, and Europe apparently still hasn't caught up yet.

You're sullying a heroic performance -- and it was heroic, whether I need it to be or not -- by publicizing a not-for-public, preliminary result of an analysis for a naturally ocurring substance. And on an A-sample, no less. How much more irresponsible can a "journalist" be?

By the way, get your facts straight. His test didn't come back with "high traces of testosterone." It (an A-sample only, remember) came back with a higher-than-allowed ratio of testosterone to epitestosterone. Some people are born with ratios that are deemed "doping" by virtue of the arbitrary ratio selected for this test. I realize all this is harder to type than just "high traces of testosterone," but it's an important distinction. A little research will show that an injection of testosterone will do NOTHING to enhance performance in a bike race. It will also show that there are many factors that can cause "high" ratio without the use of synthetic testosterone. I realize these details are lost on you, Mr. English, but perhaps your readers will find them interesting.

I'm sorry that Americans are proving adept at sports once dominated by Europeans. But this petty jealousy, Mr. English, is beneath you -- especially given your privileged position as someone with a public platform.

3

Ozzy,

30/07/2006 04:57:25

Antihero spins web of deceit.
Tom English the incumbent stage winner for scotlandonsunday.com was found positive on dope testing by the court of public opinion. English, was seen in the kitchen by the lad who cleans the dishes shouting to himself " I've got to please the editor, I've got to please the editor". All the more unusual was the fact that only the day before, English had hit the skids after a hard day in the office kissing his editors ar**. English is well known as a lover of the round ball and has built his career on the motto 'never let the facts get in the way of a good rumour'.

After the well known journalism scandals of 'Weapons of mass destruction' headlines, one would think that the sport of journalism would realise the if you write dopey stories, you will be caught. Despite this, English has taken a whopping dose of bull**** and run with it, lock stock and barrel thinking that he would not be dope tested. The shame of it, of course, is that using bull**** does not enhance your performance. It is well understood that bull**** always soils a good performance and in the long run the performance really stinks.

What was surprising about the English business was not that he tested positive, but that so many people believed in him in the first place.

In its best, most redemptive moments, journalism will shine a light on the unbending and indomitable human spirit, without itself falling into cheap use of words. We have however come to expect this level of crass indifference to the truth from this part of the world, the home of the Tabloid.

Raised in an enlightened system, English rebelled, choosing radio and television and computers, bombast and bull****.

Firmly believing in the dogma that footballers are drug free and that its pretty good form to feign a dodgy tackle, English again fails the dope test.

In their yard at home, the English' have two signs hanging. One says 'To Football be the glory', the

4

Dana,

30/07/2006 06:08:08

Mr. English’s article displays an shocking level of ignorance, an ignorance that robs the world of fair competition, justice, and honesty.

Mr. English apparently has no concept of the debilitating effects on the body when one “bonks”, nor how the body recovers when it is again nourished, so to perform yet another day. He does not understand that he is rendering judgment based solely on sample A, from a lab who’s expertise and neutrality has been call into question on several occasions. He does not understand the test revealed a ratio imbalance, unlikely a doping scandal. Floyd may not have had a high level of testosterone, but a low lever of epitestosterone, skewing the ratio. So, how would that have enhanced performance? Ignorance!

The author does not understand that human bodies can produce ratios as high as 4 to 1, 6 to 1, 8 to 1, or even 10 to 1, naturally! He does not understand that such an occurrence is common among professional athletes. He does not understand that Floyd Landis has a history of high testosterone levels, naturally. He does not understand that all such charges have been dismissed as unfounded when made in the past. He does not understand that cycling regulations previously allowed for testosterone ratios of 4 to 1 and 3 to 1 prior to lowering it the even more unrealistic level of 1 to 1. He does not understand that testosterone is not a performance enhancing drug when taken during a race. Mr. English just does not understand! He is ignorant, and his ignorance has done a disservice to the world.

In reality Mr. English, you should be thanking Mr. Landis. He entertained you with an awesome display, showing the world the achievements of perseverance, the extremes a human body can endure when driven by a dream. I assumed you watched the event, though your comments suggest otherwise. Had you any dignity, you would apologize for your egregious error. You are obviously not even remotely qualified to comment on this subject.

5

judy.euan@ntlworld.com,

scotland 30/07/2006 07:49:51

Bravo Mr English. Thought provoking and well written.
Oh, and by the way, I think the cyclist is guilty as hell!

6

Keith,

California 30/07/2006 08:27:53

Cheers to that Ozzy, very well written.

7

Keith,

California 30/07/2006 08:29:30

and Dana, huzzah for you.

8

Pat the Hat,

Dublin 30/07/2006 09:14:06

Your American readers can scream and shout all they like, Mr English, but we all know the truth – and it is indeed ugly. But don't take it personally, guys, it has nothing to do with nationality or inter-continental jealousy – the entire sport of cycling is bent beyond all credibility and has been for a long time now.

Poor Floyd's only problem is that he was caught bang to rights, unlike some.

I mean, who could believe that a good but not great cyclist could recover from virulent cancer, appoint a coach from the former East Germany who had been inextricably tied into the many doping scandals there, remain clean, become the greatest cyclist in history and win a record seven Tours in a row? Other than the Brothers Grimm, of course?

Allegedly! lol!

9

Ozzy,

30/07/2006 10:26:50

Now, Euan and Patrick, I hope you're sitting down. There is no Santa Clause or Garden fairy and I'm not American, I'm Scottish. However, thanks for your incite.

I'm amazed that the worlds legal systems haven't beat a path to your respective doors.

How silly of us to assume that the way the justice system should work is the way of the Great inquisition. It would save so much time and dispense with those pesky defence lawyers.

However, I'm not really clear if this method of justice would actually apply to you. I have to assume that you would accept being guilty as charged no matter what the charge, because the system must be right.

One thing is for sure, neither of you have demonstrated any idea of:
1. the testing process
2. the flaws within the test
3. the history of poor standards within the laboratory
4. the physical demands of the sport

Cycling is one of the most tested, if not ,THE most tested professional sport, with all others a very distant way off in testing. Cyclists can barely recieve rudimentary medical care available to any other person because it infringes the doping rules.

As far as many other sports go, if you're not looking for it, how can you be caught cheating?

Please, do some reading other than tabloid crap

10

Angry Panda,

30/07/2006 10:36:35

Good one English!
I found your latest attempt at journalism immature, and your article angered me.
Your comments on the subject of Floyd Landis are unfounded and clearly badly researched. At this point in time, there is not enough hard evidence to make a comment as biased as your mediocre excuse for journalism.
Tom, I suggest that you think about what you publish in future, try researching - you may then actually know what you are talking about.
I commend and agree with comments, 1, 2, 3 and 4, and I ask Euan and Patrick on what basis do you make your comments? Did you even read the above commets? Or did they just wash over you?
How many footballers are tested after every game? Have you ever heard of Maradonna?

I will leave you with this, if the Football league were as harsh on drug cheats as cycling, how much of a football league would be left?

11

judy.euan@ntlworld.com,

Glasgow 30/07/2006 11:24:30

Dear All,

This morning, I was sitting at the breakfast table reading the paper. After reading some of your reaction to English's article I felt as if I'd been thrown into the High Court and was embroiled in the finer points of jurisprudence.
I don't care much if Landis cheated.
The point here is what a newspaper is for. It is not to fight for justice or truth. A newspaper's first goal is to make money within the legal parameters of freedom of speech.
A good way to do this is to create a reaction. Assuming a controversial position is only Mr English doing his job. His bosses expect it. He will not sit on any of the medical/sporting committees which ultimately will decide on the guilt/innocence of Landis. These decision making forums will have the knowledge and assessment skills that were demand by the comments from America.
Journalism in the Sports Section of the SoS is to be enjoyed with bacon and eggs and taken with a pinch of salt!

12

Andy,

30/07/2006 11:44:07

Well, with the current run of drug controversy surrounding sport in general it is no surprise that another "star" has imploded on himself. Although Testerone would not be the drug of choice for cyclists a degenerative hip disorder means that spiking with testerone would of helped muscular recovery. It is not a case of whether it would of helped, with quick acting pills available the hormone would of gone straight in to the system and created enough of a lift to give the effect shown on the climb the day of the 'positive' test. From looking down and out to winning was a great turn round and I would love to believe it was psychological lift but the evidence suggests strongly an outside interference. It maybe that this is the kick that sport needs to deal with the ever increasing controversy surrounding it. Whether or not this turns out to be the biggest scandal in cycling history is not for me to predict or judge, but is by far time that those watching 'sport' understood that drugs are deeply inbedded within nearly every sport and going back through the history books the original olympiad imploded on itself because of doping problems. I think we have come full circle and sport is in for a very sticky ride... I work with elite athletes and hope that they are able to compete on a level playing field some day!

13

Pat the Hat,

Dublin 30/07/2006 12:06:12

Ozzy and Angry Panda,

How silly of me to get my info from the tabloids.

How silly of me to remember the much-misunderstood Tyler Hamilton, another American.

How silly of me to to look askance at poor Floyd appointing a lawyer who tried to defend the guilty-as-sin Roberto Heras from his positive test for erythropoietin, which, by a strange coincidence, is the very substance that the great Lance himself "allegedly" tested positive for in 1999.

How silly of me to remember that Ullrich, Basso and Mancebo were ejected from the Tour the day before it started and then to forget that only Europeans are guilty, Americans never are.

If poor Floyd's B sample is mysteriously damaged or found to be inconclusive (memories of Lance once again) it will be only because a guilty verdict will destroy the last remaining vestiges of credibility of professional cycling.

But as Euan said, who cares? It's nearly my lunchtime.

14

christopher,

ayrshire 30/07/2006 14:28:00

Im with Keith, this is very poor comentary. Kind of indicative of British Journalisms response to cycle sport; during the last tour (still the worlds largest annual sporting event) there was a notable absence of reporting of the event on certain key days, yet another suspected drug scandal and its front page news?!!!
I hope Landis does come out with a reasonable explanation as to why this result came about, and hopefully this result will transform the current protocols for drugs testing. most of these tests (including the testosterone one) effectively prove that a rider has taken foreign substances for benefit, Instead they are all based on a scale of what is percieved as healthy and 'normal'. But why not accept these are superhuman athletes who are special to us because they are not 'normal'? Pantani's career was decimated on route to his second giro win because of a high hemocratic level, with no proof this was artificial, are we going to allow the same tragic downfall to happen to landis because we naievly believe that our tests are 100% effective? Why couldnt it be that Landis is a winner because his body produces extra testorsterone, that Pantani was unique because he was able to absorb more Oxygen into his blood? Indurains was never penalised for his enormous lung capacity and slow pulse - a factor which cleary separates him as being far from normal!
and for all the anti cycling rhetoric we hear from the world anti doping agency.... cycling tests more than any other sport, cycling was not the only sport linked to operation puerto, but its still our sport thats vilified.
Well good luck to floyd, and everyone else condemned before fair trial by such 'well researched' journalists as Tom English.
Meanwhile I hope Vinokourov, who has seen the efforts of his entire career robbed this year through having no connection at all to doping, take every idiot journalist and vigilante sports director to court.
grrrrr!

15

Michael,

Last Defender against the Caliphate-USA 31/07/2006 00:14:24

Regardless of the likelihood that that in a mere two generations those of you across the pond will be in a transitional state between the supranational dismantling of your freedoms, values, and national identities via the EU and the installation of Sharia Law by way of the ummah that devoured you (heck, don't think I'm bragging, we're likely just a generation behind you), let's have a go at that nascently anachornistic concept, freedom of speech, while we still can, shall we? Kudos to those with the mathematical grasp of ratios, that the value between two factors can grow due to an increase in one or a decrease in the other, or both even! This is not to say that has any bearing on the innocence or guilt of Landis or not, just glad the point was made. Now to my thuroughly "wind-bagged" point. Considering that it appears to be greatly debatable whether a boost in testosterone, especially in a period of less than twenty-four hours would augment performance considerably at all, and considering that the purported boost necessary, a unique, mind-boggling turnaround from absolute decimation in stage 16 to absolute dominance in stage 17 through one of the most grueling sections of the most difficult race in pro cycling seems beyond anything but wishful naivety to attribute to a doping mechanism that many, if not most, doping experts argue would be pointless in this event, in this particular context. Isn't it time to point blame at the real culprit, for the future integrity of cycling everywhere? Ban the ingestion of cheap whiskey during events-fine, single-malt Scotch, even! Ol' Jack appears to be more than a pirate of goods and ships, he snags the Tour de France as well. I don't know if Landis is guilty or not folks, but if he is, it would appear that the method of cheating must be more than testosterone enhancement. Otherwise, how could the scientific doping community be less than unanimously aware of the incredulous, gigantic, immediate gains to be

16

Mark,

Homer, Alaska, USA 31/07/2006 01:30:35

Mr. English,

I condemn your condemnation of Floyd Landis when the full evidence about his testosterone-epitestosterone test has yet to be disclosed and the full inquiry about what it means has yet to be debated. Maybe Landis will turn out to be a cheat. I hope not. I am an American, but my allegiance is not based on nationality in the case of bicycle racing. If irrefutable evidence is there after a full inquiry and debate, Landis should be condemned and dishonored. We have yet to reach that time. Your condemnation at this stage -- of not only Landis but those who are unwilling to join your lynching party -- is not only premature but as disgraceful as a dope-cheating cyclist.

Mark Turner
Homer, Alaska, USA

17

jane,

california 31/07/2006 04:06:33

This article is regoddamndiculous. Aside from your lack of scientific knowledge and or support, your writing lacks integrity. Why would you waste your time writing facts you know not to be true? You are no more credible than the accusations you throw out. I found your article looking for information and instead I find a pile of bull****. You ought to be ashamed.

18

Mark,

Australia 31/07/2006 04:19:35

As Tom English said - 'Only the terminally gullible will have been surprised by this' - it turns out that these are mostly American, with a few token others. I hope that Landis' B sample is negative, but we all know that is vey unlikely. Meanwhile the best that can come out of this is that the screws are turned tighter on those who would like to win be cheating. Yes CHEATING, that is what it is. And to our American friends - Calm down - YOU ARE NOT BEING PERSECUTED.

19

Justin,

Australia 31/07/2006 05:19:04

What makes someone want to cheat? Is it the overpowing egotism to be the best there is/was/ever will be? Is it the chance of fame, fortune and/or glory? Being a household name for whatever reason? Or is it more an admission that one knows they are merely ordinary and will never be better than their competitors without help?

The public generally idolises its sporting heroes (I should know - I am Australian!!! Winning at sport as an Aussie is almost a matter of life and death... ). Sport is thrown in our faces every minute of every day as the pinnacle of human achievement. Top sportspeople are the fastest, strongest, most beautiful examples of humanity we can produce as a civilization.

The very nature of sport these days is to BE better than everyone else. Second best is second rate. Who ever remembers who came second? And the more winners a society and culture can produce, the more it will reflect on that nation as being powerful and strong within this world. Why else do we have medal counts at major international competitions? To show which nation is the most dominant of course!

Where did these values come from? When did sport become so important in the world? Is it because of the money to be made? Or the fame?

So why do people cheat? What motivates them? Do these people not realise that the same media that lauds them as a champion will immediately dehumanise them as a cheat if they are caught? Is it really THAT important to be the best?

Do people cheat because we as humans cant bear the thought of not getting any better? Of reaching our natural plateau and therefore not being able to improve ourselves any further? What then? Do we not pride ourselves on forever advancing ourselves as a species? Do we begin to decline?

I dont know the answers to any of these flighty questions that I ask! All I know is that it is a shameful reflection on all of us that we feel the need to cheat each other to prove a point.

Maybe we should

20

Andy,

01/08/2006 08:17:25

Just a little thing for those of you going on about the natural levels of testerone and how he might just be super human!... It is possible to trace testerone form an external 'manufactured' source! It has a different signature to that of naturaly produced testerone. And as for mentioning Miguel Indurain's lung capacity, that is something that is mostly genetic but is adjustable by vast quantities of aerobic training... as by-product his heart becomes more effecient and his resting and active heart rates will be lower.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.