Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

The hunt is On.
Sponsored by
Can you track down Scotland's wildest beastie?

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

The Republicans: For Dubya, the only way is up



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 09 November 2008
WHEN George W Bush leaves the White House following the inauguration of President Barack Obama on January 20, 2009, he will, barring a miracle, depart office as the least popular president since modern records began.
All former presidents seek to work on their reputation; after Iraq, Afghanistan and Hurricane Katrina, for Bush it's a must do. Faced with similar, though less dramatic dips in their popularity, other past residents of the White House have fallen bac
k on two ways of improving their standing: creating lavish Presidential Libraries which give their version of their legacy, and writing books.

Plans for the first are well under way. The George W Bush Memorial Library, comprising a library, museum and institute, will be hosted at the Southern Methodist University in Dallas. The library will allow scholars to trace the Bush White House's internal discussions on the legality of waterboarding, or the legal status of inmates in Guantanamo Bay. The institute could well be used to push Bush's interventionist line in foreign affairs and flesh out the Bush Doctrine, the president's attempt to codify his defining political philosophy.

"The first thing he will want to do is relax and recharge his batteries," said Mike Franc of Washington-based conservative think tank the Heritage Foundation. "He has been president for two exhausting terms, so he will have a lot of work to do fixing up his ranch."

Robert Draper, a Texas-born writer, interviewed Bush for his book Dead Certain: The Presidency Of George W Bush. Asked about life after the White House, Bush said: "I can just envision getting in the car, getting bored, going down to the ranch." His priority, the president said, was to "replenish the ol' coffers".

It's hard to believe he needs to: independent assessments put the value of the former oil man at between $9m and $16m (£10.2m). But if the Bush bank accounts have been depleted during his time in the White House then he will be relieved to know that he is about to join a high-earning fraternity; no one in the former presidents' club struggles for cash.

On top of the $186,000 pension plus generous allowances that Bush will receive from the federal government, former presidents can earn massive amounts from making speeches. It would seem a remarkable development for a man who has said: "Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we." However, any former president will find himself in demand and with the ability to earn large sums of money.

Shortly after leaving office, Ronald Reagan received $2m for making two speeches in Japan. Even the less inspirational President George HW Bush, Dubya's father, pockets $100,000 per speech.

Bush may prefer to make his money in oil, the family business, with a series of lucrative positions on the boards of petroleum companies. Famously inarticulate, he is thought unlikely to go down the route of writing books, aside from the obligatory ghost-written memoir of his time in office.

Nor is Bush considered likely to follow the route laid down by former president Jimmy Carter. He has transformed himself into an international human rights activist, observing elections in disputed corners of the globe. Bush, not famed as a traveller before getting elected (one of his few trips outside the US was to Scotland) is, as a result of his policy in Iraq, considered to be at serious risk of assassination if he travels abroad.

As well as financial recovery, historians say presidential reputations can also be turned around after leaving office. Truman, now acclaimed as one of the finest presidents of the last century, was derided as a disaster immediately after leaving office.

Whether that happens to Bush partly depends on events beyond his control, like what happens in Iraq. If Baghdad becomes prosperous and peaceful, then stock in Bush Jnr may start to rise again. In the short term, Laura Bush, the respected first lady who devoted her time to literacy programmes, may have a higher profile than her husband.

But in the long run, some Conservatives even speculate that the former president, who will be just 62 when he retires, might take up political office again. "I'd nominate him to be Secretary General of the United Nations so he could fix that institution," said Franc.

Best of Bushspeak…

I just want you to know that when we talk about war, we're really talking about peace
June 18, 2002

I know the human being and fish can coexist peacefully
September 29, 2000

They misunderestimated me
November 6, 2000

The lipstick pit bull won't be muzzled

SARAH Palin finished this election campaign a winner. The Alaska Governor is now a major star in the Republican Party, adored by the right-wing grassroots and perhaps even capable of snaring the presidential nomination herself in 2012.

Though controversy and ridicule continue to swirl around her, with allegations last week that she had no idea Africa was a continent before accepting the vice-presidential nomination, she has become a Teflon figure; nothing seems to stick.

"Palin is a rock star. She is the only popular Republican I can think of. If the Christian conservatives win the battle for the soul of the party, she will have a bright future," said one party insider.

Palin isn't short of job offers. Right-wing cable TV shows have been scrambling to sign her up as a presenter, and back in Alaska she is currently considering a "mile high" list of interview requests.

The most intriguing suggestion as to what she will do next stems from the conviction and disgrace of Alaska Senator Ted Stevens. Convicted this month of graft, Stevens is likely to lose his senate seat. In that event, it is the job of the state governor to appoint a replacement senator. Would La Palin have the brass neck to appoint herself senator for her home state in time to gather some Senate experience before 2012? It's the latest theory doing the rounds, and with shops in Alaska selling out of 'Palin 2012' T-shirts, the feverish excitement this woman generates shows no sign of abating.

As for John McCain, this isn't the first time he has lost the presidency. In 2000, when George W Bush defeated him in the primaries, McCain emerged with his reputation enlarged, as one of the most popular politicians in the country. This time, after a gracious concession speech on election night, there are signs that McCain could slip back into a familiar political role as bipartisan maverick.

"There's a need for the old John McCain, a leader who worked in a bipartisan way," said Democrat Senator Chuck Schumer.

Matt Welch, McCain's biographer, said: "He'll enjoy going back to being a national uncle figure and working on his public image. He'll criticise the conservative base of the party. He'll write some books and go back to being on The Daily Show and Letterman and cracking jokes – often at his own expense."

McCain will only be in the Senate for two years. In his concession speech he offered Obama his full support and insiders predict the two may work together on restructuring the military and on Iraq.

"When I saw him speak," said one insider, "he seemed to be relieved that he no longer had to preside over a campaign which he at some level knew was less than fully honourable."

Whether the furiously competitive senator will slope off to his Sedona ranch to beat himself up for allowing his presidential campaign to go off in the wrong direction, only his family and closest allies will ever know.



The full article contains 1294 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 08 November 2008 10:37 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: US elections
 
1

,

09/11/2008 00:42:24
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
2

2dogs in D.C.,

09/11/2008 01:26:40
Now,now,Postit-forgive,forget and move on.Bush has his "legacy",which future generations will deride.
3

Postmark-55,

China, 09/11/2008 01:39:11
#2 2dogs in D.C.,
Agreed double dog, but let's not ever FORGET, lessons are learned only from remembering.
4

2dogs in D.C.,

09/11/2008 01:43:52
Yep.
5

Rob Bennett,

Point Piper Australia 09/11/2008 01:47:21
"The George W Bush Memorial Library"

I didn't know Bush could read, the only time I saw Bush with a book in his hand was in a kids class and he was holding the book upside down.

What about his reaction in the classroom after being informed about the 9/11 attacks

Bush stood there for 7 minutes in a daze and did absolutely nothing. Check the video out again:
http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=5WztB6HzXxI

Hague prosecutor says Bush and Blair could face war crime charges in the near future for the deaths of up to 1 million Iraqis. Let's hope so.

Sarah Palin the consummate bimbo is forming a new sect with Pastor Muthee known as the 'Sarah Palin Evangelical Bimbo Brigade' that includes Carolyn and Lynne. Looks like 'Proud to be Valley Trash' T-Shirts are in vogue and will be standard garb for members of the movement.
6

2dogs in D.C.,

09/11/2008 01:59:00
Aw,come on,Rob.He was busy reading ,what was it? "My pet goat"?
7

Rob Bennett,

Point Piper Australia 09/11/2008 02:03:54
#6 2dogs in D.C

LOL. Actually I think he must have been looking at the pictures, he probably had never seen a goat before.
8

Postmark-55,

China, 09/11/2008 02:06:46
#7 Rob Bennett,
Well not with the lights on anyways.
9

2dogs in D.C.,

09/11/2008 02:08:07
Well, I wasn't there so I can't say for sure. You may well be right.
10

Rob Bennett,

Point Piper Australia 09/11/2008 02:23:52

God only knows what Bush was thinking while looking at pictures of goats
11

Dunnie,

Canada 09/11/2008 02:23:56

2 dugs, Postsmudge and Convict Robbie - your collective circle jerk is quite boring.

Having a go at Dubya is like shooting fish in a barrel.

Has anybody yet bothered to find out who was funding Obama and why he still refuses to release the list of his campaign contributors?

$6 million for his campaign informercial, just days before a foregone conclusion, would have been beter spent feeding a lot of people in his hometown of Chicago.

Change? Change in Washington? His first act is to appoint a rabid pit bull as his Chief of Staff. Ol' Rahmbo will make Nixon's crew look like a bunch of amateur w*nkers.
12

Postmark-55,

China, 09/11/2008 02:24:51
#9 2dogs in D.C.,
Tell me please double dog, do you grow goatnip as well, or is goatnip something you get after trying to have one's way with said goat?
13

Postmark-55,

China, 09/11/2008 02:28:15
#11 Dunnie,
Get a life.
Having a go at you is even easier but why waste our words on you?
You have no way in hell of understanding anything we say to you.
14

Dunnie,

Canada 09/11/2008 02:33:32
Postsmudge - Imbecile. Your sophomoric words are indeed a waste but when you post them for the world to read - you shouldn't be surprised that you are ridiculed.

I find it rather amusing that you have not seen fit to address the questions regarding Obama's mysterious financing.
15

2dogs in D.C.,

09/11/2008 02:39:39
Saints preserve us, we're being called names by Dunnie. Don't know about you others, but I must now fall upon my sword.
16

Postmark-55,

China, 09/11/2008 02:43:35
#14 Dunnie,
I only question who's guiding your fingers to the keys on your keyboard.
17

2dogs in D.C.,

09/11/2008 02:49:39
Dunnie-In answer to your question re: Obama's finances, a huge ammount was raised from small doners like myself-five, ten,twenty bucks a pop. Obama used the internet like never before,and it worked.Get over it,man,it's a done deal.
18

Dunnie,

Canada 09/11/2008 02:56:23
2 Dugs - Good on you.

Now, address the question: Why doesn't Obama release the names of his major contributors?

Such a gesture would indeed give proof to that change is upon the American political scene. Oh by the way Obama: Yes you can and, yes, you should.

Good riddance to Dubya. What a feckin moron! I thought you Yanks specialized in revolutions and assassinations? His two elections to office are surely something Americans will take generations to get over - that is a done deal. :)
19

2dogs in D.C.,

09/11/2008 03:02:23
Dunnie-I can't say why Obama won't release the names. I'm far from his inner circle. Why don't you ask him?
20

Dunnie,

Canada 09/11/2008 03:06:57

Come off the flippancy. You are the one who sent him money. I believe you have a right to know.

$6 million for an informercial - five days before election day - when he was at least 10 points ahead in the polls? That is obscene.


o
21

Postmark-55,

China, 09/11/2008 03:10:24
#20 Dunnie,
It was his money. I don't care how you spend your money, that's your business, he spent it advertising himself and it got him elected, like double dog said, get over it.
22

2dogs in D.C.,

09/11/2008 03:11:26
Well,it worked,right? Can't argue with success. And Flippant is my middle name.
23

Guga II,

Rockall 09/11/2008 03:14:43
Bush is very unlikely to travel abroad. He is in too much danger of being arrested as a war criminal, so he is only likely to travel to any country that the septics have bought and paid for. In that regard, he will be safe enough coming to the YUK, as long as that other war criminal, Maggie Broon, is in charge.
24

Dunnie,

Canada 09/11/2008 03:18:47
21 - "It was his money. I don't care how you spend your money, that's your business, he spent it advertising himself and it got him elected".

God's teeth! FFS! That is exactly my point: it wasn't his money. Without full disclosure, you do not know whether or not he is beholden to big corporate interests.

Considering that almost half the American electorate - 48-49% - voted against him , I think it would be very interesting where he got such big campaign bucks.

Get over it? As a Canadian, I really don't care. However, I would suggest to you that you get on to it rather than over it.
25

2dogs in D.C.,

09/11/2008 03:19:02
#20-Dunnie-Really,I don't so much care about the funding as I do the results.
26

2dogs in D.C.,

09/11/2008 03:20:40
P.S.To my above-which remain to be seen.
27

Dunnie,

Canada 09/11/2008 03:24:34
2 Dugs "Well,it worked,right? Can't argue with success."

So the means justify the end(s)? Be careful for what you wished and paid for. Success as defined in politics can be be a cheap and tawdry result ( Nixon, Clinton, Blair - dare I say Broon?).
28

2dogs in D.C.,

09/11/2008 03:29:45
Again,Mr.Dunnie,results are what will matter. I can't see the future,but I can hope.If you've got a window to the future,please share.
29

Postmark-55,

China, 09/11/2008 03:30:30
#24 Dunnie,
The burden lies in proving guilt, what you're saying about Obama is only talk.
You also contradict your self,
here's your first qoute.
"$6 million for his campaign informercial, just days before a foregone conclusion, would have been beter spent feeding a lot of people in his hometown of Chicago".
Here's your second quote.
"Considering that almost half the American electorate - 48-49% - voted against him , I think it would be very interesting where he got such big campaign bucks.

What you have implied with your second quote is that the race was very close and both double dog and myself have pointed out that the money he spent on that advertising campaign was well spent, it got him to the White House, well if he lives long enough to make it that is.
30

Dunnie,

Canada 09/11/2008 03:30:36

25 and 26 - Those results may be effected by those who financed him. As somenone once said: " Only three things ever came out of Chicago: wh*res, good steak and good football players". Hmmm.
31

Yane,

09/11/2008 03:33:16
Excuse me butting in lads but do you reckon it's true this article? I mean — is he hated more than Nixon was?
32

Postmark-55,

China, 09/11/2008 03:37:10
#31 Yane,
Nixon was a saint compared to Bush, where Nixon would have been a mere choir boy as to where Bush is the Pope, and that ain't a compliment.
In my 50 years I've never seen the likes of Bush and I hope I never will again.
33

2dogs in D.C.,

09/11/2008 03:38:30
#30-And maybe,a good president? Time only, will tell.
34

Dunnie,

Canada 09/11/2008 03:41:43

29 - I am not implying guilt. I am simply asking why a candidate who says he stands for change, does not walk the talk when it comes to transparency and accountability about campaign financing.

I find it most troubling about a man who I want to be the President that the US so desperately needs.

As to my comments regarding percentages and financing,I see no contradiction. I view a $6 million informercial as obscene.

35

Rob Bennett,

Point Piper Australia 09/11/2008 03:44:17
31 Yane

Apparently Bush is the most unpopular president since the invention of the opinion polls
36

2dogs in D.C.,

09/11/2008 03:44:42
#31-Yane-That's a damned good question.I lived and suffered under Nixon, and for the longest time, I thought he was the worst.However,under the present administration,we in the U.S, have never been so hated on an international scale. I just want the U.S. to be right again. Oh,Yeah.Back to your question-Bush=worst. And now the attacks begin.
37

Dunnie,

Canada 09/11/2008 03:46:26

33 - 2 Dugs - well mate, for your sake and that of your country, I hope you are right.

Good night all. I am sure we will exchange views as time passes.
38

Dunnie,

Canada 09/11/2008 03:52:23

2 Dugs - America is not hated here in Canada. We are, however, mystified how your countrymen saw fit to elect Dubya - not once but twice.

I sincerely hope that Obama can lead you out of the morass - both domestically and internationally - that you presently find yourself in.

My previous postings just signal my refusal to join in the general giddiness that has surrounded the commentary about Barrack Obama. Good luck.
39

2dogs in D.C.,

09/11/2008 03:53:42
#37-Dunnie-Good dreams, and I will look forward to more cyber duels. ;-).
40

Dunnie,

Canada 09/11/2008 03:57:06

39 - 2 Dugs - not duels mate- just exchanges.
41

2dogs in D.C.,

09/11/2008 04:02:20
Your on. Good night.
42

Newton_Invented_Gravity,

09/11/2008 09:49:14
Bush's legacy in Iraq will not be a good one if it depends on Iraq becoming peacefull and prosperous. The reality is that the 'win' scenario that the US is pursuing is simply one of colonization of the country. As we see in history, it is possible to create an apparently peaceful colony. But it's a lot harder to hold onto it, and there can be little doubt that once the US does leave tribal conflicts will break out for control of the country.
43

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 09/11/2008 12:51:28
2 dogs in D.C.

Good morning to you and your beloved canine companions.

The weather here is glorious and Chester has a special treat - we walked and ran for over an hour. I am exhausted and he is ready for more. He WILL sleep the rest of the day.

Many, many postings from you on this thread. Curious.

How can there be a "George W. Bush Memorial Library" when the man can hardly read without moving his lips?

As for the discredited Republican supporters of George and his party, let them eat humble pie and crawl back into the privileged, gated communities (WHITE ONLY!) from which they spout their racist and stupid rants.
44

2dogs in D.C.,

09/11/2008 13:05:06
Well,good morning back at you.Dogs will run you ragged,but then THEY get to snooze all day,while we are occupied with the weekend catch-up. The many postings last night seemed necessary(aand kind of fun).
45

D. Feste - Illyria, OH,

09/11/2008 13:09:56

So, I wasn't the only one that was creeped out by that "smile" . . .


McCain Speechwriter Trying To Write Lines That Don't Lead To Creepy Smile
September 2, 2008 | Issue 44•36


PHOENIX, AZ—According to campaign sources, Joseph Chappel, a 38-year-old speechwriter for Sen. John McCain (R-AZ), has spent the last two weeks attempting to combine words and phrases in such a way as to not provoke a tight-jawed, dead-eyed smile from the presidential hopeful. Dreading a repeat of last month's speech to a group of businesswomen in Ohio, during which McCain followed a mention of his wife with an awkward and eerie smirk, Chappel has avoided personal anecdotes for the new speech, omitted any mention of "God" or "this great nation," and cut several phrases that had the potential to draw the 72-year-old candidate's mouth open in a horrifying display of teeth and gums.

"I've managed to make two out of every three sentences a question, but I'm not sure that will help," Chappel said shortly after deleting an introductory paragraph in which McCain welcomes the crowd.

"Jesus, that [smile] makes me feel cold inside."

Chappel told reporters that if he is not able to write an appropriate, smile-free speech in time for the Republican National Convention, he will resign his position and return to his previous job, taking photographs of abused children for police reports.

46

D. Feste - Illyria, OH,

09/11/2008 13:18:44
Sen. Graham: GOP Lost to Obama's Positive View

Friday, November 7, 2008 5:30 PM

Article Font Size




CHARLESTON, S.C. -- Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham said Friday the GOP lost the White House because the party was tainted by corruption, overspending and "sometimes came across as a bunch of grumpy old men."

EXACTLY !
47

2dogs in D.C.,

09/11/2008 13:42:19
#45-46,D.Feste-Whaaa? Kind of out of left field.This one's about the Bush legacy.(Though,I'd tend to agree.)
48

D. Feste - Illyria, OH,

09/11/2008 17:20:42

#47- 2Dogs

Dogs - My posts # 45 & 46 are the direct result of the Bush administration and form a critical part of his legacy.

He destroyed his country and his Republican party as well ! After Bush, all the Republicans could do was to run this grumpy old guy and the bimbo, as they had no other hand to play. Now the party is unable to determine it's direction, values, nor power base.

That's what I call a legacy of self-destruction !
49

D. Feste - Illyria, OH,

09/11/2008 17:22:17

2Dogs-

Thought you might appreciate this video -

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RHWByjoQrR8
50

Symon,

USA 10/11/2008 04:13:57
Old Bush is really starting to get a hiding in the press. His dad wasn't much better either. I hope Obama can bring some respect back our way. After holidaying in Europe I couldn't believe how many people hate us especially our lame duck government that started so many wars
51

SCULLlON1,

Canada 11/11/2008 02:48:55
#50 Symon,USA

It's a shame your press is so biased and in bed with the liberals. I see your liberal congrss has a lowere approval rating than Bush.
52

,

12/11/2008 04:42:25
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.