Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

The hunt is On.
Sponsored by
Can you track down Scotland's wildest beastie?

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Churchill held Jews to blame for persecution



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 11 March 2007
WINSTON Churchill suggested the Jewish people were "partly responsible for the antagonism from which they suffer", according to a document made public for the first time.
A historian at Cambridge University has uncovered the article written by Churchill in 1937, three years before he became prime minister.

Entitled 'How The Jews Can Combat Persecution' - by the Rt Hon Winston Churchill, it never saw the light of d
ay after Churchill's private office stepped in to say publication would be "inadvisable".

The document lay buried in the university's Churchill archive for more than 60 years until historian Dr Richard Toye unearthed it while researching a new biography of the wartime leader. There is a suggestion the article was ghostwritten for Churchill.

But Toye said: "If it was ghostwritten, Churchill was apparently happy to put his name to this article in 1937. Like many of today's politicians, he was happy to endorse the sentiments contained in articles that were written for him."

Those sentiments include a complaint that cheap Jewish labour was "taking employment from English people" - a foreshadowing of today's arguments about the influx of immigrants to Britain.

The piece begins with reference to persecution of Jews over the centuries and refers to a new wave of anti-Semitism.

"It would be easy to ascribe it to the wickedness of the persecutors, but that does not fit all the facts," it reads.

"It exists even in lands, like Great Britain and the United States, where Jew and Gentile are equal in the eyes of the law, and where large numbers of Jews have found, not only asylum, but opportunity.

"These facts must be faced in any analysis of anti-Semitism. They should be pondered especially by the Jews themselves. For it may be that, unwittingly, they are inviting persecution - that they have been partly responsible for the antagonism from which they suffer."

The article goes on: "The central fact which dominates the relations of Jew and non-Jew is that the Jew is 'different'. He looks different. He thinks differently. He has a different tradition and background. He refuses to be absorbed."

Elsewhere, the article is sympathetic towards Jewish people and it is clear Churchill disapproves of their persecution.

He writes: "In fact, the Jew is as a rule a good citizen. He is sober, industrious, law-abiding. He identifies himself - up to a point - with the country in which he lives. He is ready, if need be, to fight and to die for it. Jewish soldiers served in the armies both of the Allies and of the Central Powers during the Great War. Twelve thousand of them died for Germany."

And Churchill ends by urging the British people to stand up for the Jews.

"The Jews are suffering from persecutions as cruel, as relentless and as vindictive as any in their long history," he writes.

"There is no virtue in a tame acquiescence in evil. To protest against cruelty and wrong, and to strive to end them, is the mark of a man. And when the victim of oppression is a brother in blood and faith, to attempt his succour becomes a sacred duty."

The document was originally offered to the US publication Liberty in 1937 but was withdrawn when another magazine for which Churchill wrote objected to him supplying a rival.

Churchill nevertheless tried to have it published in the Strand Magazine, but it declined the offer because it had already taken a similar article from former prime minister Lloyd George, according to Toye.

In early 1940, when Churchill was First Lord of the Admiralty, Sunday Dispatch editor Charles Eade was given leave to republish some of Churchill's old journalism. But when he asked to use this article, Churchill's secretary, Kathleen Hill, wrote to him on March 13 saying it would be "inadvisable".

Toye, a lecturer in British political and constitutional history, found the letter while researching his book Lloyd George And Churchill: Rivals For Greatness, to be published on March 16.

He said: "It appears to have been overlooked - I think a lot of people thought that the file it was in only contained copies of articles that had already been published.

"It was certainly quite a shock to read some of these things under Winston Churchill's name and it is obviously at odds with the traditional idea we have of him."



The full article contains 730 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

Anne,

11/03/2007 06:16:16

As an attempt to look at two sides of a question, I don't see that the article is so very shocking. The idea that failure to integrate fully into society can lay a group open to persecution is still accepted today.
Churchill examines possibilities and reaches the conclusion that the persecutions the Jews were suffering were "cruel, relentless and vindictive",
which does not read as though he were condoning it.

2

Allan2000,

Edinburgh 11/03/2007 08:14:24

This is an example of extremely poor journalism - the title of this article is sensationalist and does not really reflect what Churchill was saying.

I expect better from the Scotsman.

3

Cadgers,

Perth 11/03/2007 09:27:32

Nobody should expect better from the Scotsman.

4

somerferg,

Oz 11/03/2007 10:03:13

Remember Gruinard !

5

Porry,

11/03/2007 10:05:16

One should not forget that this article was written before Hitler ordered what he called 'The Final Solution of the Jewish Issue', the extermination of the Jews, termed 'Holocaust' today. Churchill's text tries to provide an analysis of the situation Jews were faced with---not only in Germany. Anti-Semitism was a wide-spread phenomenon in 19th and 20th-century Europe and red-neck/WASP US circles.

6

Binny,

London 11/03/2007 11:10:19

Please stop criticizing the headlines or the author of this article. It is quite obvious you're all trying to cover up Churchill's so called 'anti-semitism'. It doesn't matter which newspaper article one reads, Churchill's message was simple.

Jews were persecuted for simply being 'Jewish'.

7

paul the binman,

11/03/2007 11:40:17

I bet there was a whole lot more anti semitism in 1937 but that seems to have gone by the start of the war.Or does the fact that Brirain became the home for huge amounts of diplaced jews from all across Europe not mean anything.Or the fact that large numbers of these same jews jioned the British army.To judge a man on some thing he may or may not have even read seems a little harsh when we see what he went on to do for this nation and the free world during the war. Or are the PC mob now having ago at the past from todays PC views.

8

nuneaton,

sassenachville 11/03/2007 12:31:30

i don't like defending churchill - my family is from the east end of london in the war and folk there mostly hated him.
but his comments - as quoted - are pretty reasonable - particularly for a time when the brit upper classes were even more antisemitic than the populace.
despite what we'd like to think, groups that look, dress, speak, behave differently from ourselves ARE seen as different - some are liked for it though most aren't. and cheap labour does indeed worsen the conditions of the local workers - though it makes money for the employers!
so he says all this but insists the german jews do not deserve the treatment they are already seen to be receiving from the nazis.... pretty enlightened for anyone - let alone ruddy churchill!

9

Mart on Skye,

11/03/2007 14:53:15

How different this article would have looked at a cursory glance if it had started with the quotation with which Churchill ended his article.

"The Jews are suffering from persecutions as cruel, as relentless and as vindictive as any in their long history," he writes.

"There is no virtue in a tame acquiescence in evil. To protest against cruelty and wrong, and to strive to end them, is the mark of a man. And when the victim of oppression is a brother in blood and faith, to attempt his succour becomes a sacred duty."

I cannot see that this sentiment is at odds with the popular view of the man.

His analysis may or may not have been accurate or acceptable in todays PC age but there is no doubting where his sympathies lay.

10

Big Wullie,

Glasgow 11/03/2007 15:03:21

See Corruption On Large Scale
Please take time to read all comments linked below

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7WhJUjhequ4

11

Mark McKellar,

U.S. 11/03/2007 15:21:04

Where's the link to Churhill's entire article from 1937 that the Scotsman excerpted so we can judge its tone and reasoning for ourselves? By the way, if you fault someone because he's "different," you implicitly acknowledge that you are "different," too -- from him!

12

Choosername,

11/03/2007 16:48:25

Bad journalism, bad editing. here's nothing to learn from this.

13

cjk,

chicago 07/05/2008 20:05:06
What a misleading headline. Real, real poor, I'll remember the name Anita Singh! Also, Binny, you're an ignorant a-hole.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Is the government right to continue with its policy of cutting down quangos?
No, I think their independence means we get a better job
Yes, they are unaccountable and expensive
Only if their work is duplicated or plainly redundant

Web Links:

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.