Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

The hunt is On.
Sponsored by
Can you track down Scotland's wildest beastie?

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

How Hitler cheated death in 1943 coup... thanks to the Allies



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
22 April 2007
DER Führer Adolf Hitler ist tot. These six words, announcing the death of the Nazi leader, should have brought the Second World War to an end in November 1943.
The sentence was part of a press release drafted by disaffected German officers who hatched an audacious plot to kill Hitler and then use a secret army to seize control of key sites before suing for peace with the Allies.

The full story - which s
urpasses any Hollywood war movie for drama, farce and ironic twists - has been uncovered by a German academic who closely examined detailed records left behind by the plotters.

Major General Henning von Tresckow created a new force of around 20,000 troops based in German-controlled territory in the east, telling High Command it was needed to protect against a potential revolt by slave labourers.

Tresckow then organised a 'fashion parade' at which Hitler was to inspect new uniforms, little suspecting one of the models was a suicide bomber. Once the Führer was dead, Tresckow planned to blame the killing on rogue SS elements, use his secret army to take command, and end the war.

But the putsch was foiled days before it was due to be launched, thanks to the RAF. The uniforms were among the casualties from two nights of bombing raids on Berlin, so the plot was abandoned.

Documents minutely detailing every moment of the overthrow of Nazi Germany and its aftermath were immediately buried by the panicked plotters. They were uncovered by the victorious Soviets in 1945 and lay in Moscow archives until a recent study by Professor Peter Hoffmann of the McGill University, Montreal.

Hoffman, a world authority on wartime resistance to Hitler within the German army, believes another of the plotters was Colonel Claus von Stauffenberg, the man who earned his place in history by almost killing the Führer with a briefcase bomb in 1944.

Interest in the subject of anti-Hitler plotting is likely to reach new heights later this year when Hollywood actor Tom Cruise begins shooting a major movie in which he plays Stauffenberg.

The new research shows Tresckow was an equal, if not greater, threat to Hitler. Among a close-knit group of conspirators, he worked on the demise of a man he called "the enemy of the world" and a "dancing dervish".

At least two earlier plots have been uncovered, both involving cognac bottles packed with explosives. After they failed, Tresckow began work, in the summer of 1943, on a far more ambitious scheme.

Trescow's plan was to kill Hitler at his war HQ, dubbed the 'Wolf's Lair', in East Prussia, now part of the Russian enclave of Kaliningrad. Hitler would be shown new German army winter uniforms, one of them modelled by Axel von dem Bussche, a decorated war hero who had vowed to kill the Führer after witnessing a massacre of Soviet Jews. Bussche would pose in the new uniform while holding two hand grenades, fully aware he too would die.

Meanwhile, Tresckow and his colleagues used their power to assign divisions to a new internal security force. The cover story for creating the army was to put down any attempts to rebel by enemies of the Reich such as slave workers.

It was planned that the army would begin an exercise 12 hours before the assassination and move in on Hitler's East Prussian HQ, with other troops deploying near government offices in Berlin.

Seven hours before the assassination, commanders would establish the exact location of SS troops and two hours after that be fully prepared for combat against them.

Within 10 minutes of Hitler's death, the code-words for a successful operation would be given, and the next phase of the plan would begin.

At "X plus 25 minutes" Tresckow's army would occupy the Wolf's Lair, along with the East Prussian HQs of Hermann Göring, Heinrich Himmler, and Nazi foreign minister Joachim von Ribbentrop.

After 30 minutes, a news statement was to be read on German radio, saying that Hitler was dead and accusing a "a traitorous clique" of SS and party leaders for trying to take personal advantage of the dismal situation on the Eastern Front. The statement would reassure the nation that a group of army officers had taken control and would bring stability.

But then disaster struck. On the nights of November 22 and 23, a series of bombing raids destroyed the trains containing the fashion show uniforms.

Hoffmann told Scotland on Sunday: "The plans demonstrate, and give details of, a thorough and promising preparation of a coup to seize control of Germany that was to accompany the assassination. This would have been followed by immediate armistice talks, or surrender. The plans show that the preparations of autumn 1943 were more thorough and promising of success than any other plans."

He added: "The plans demonstrate Tresckow's central role in these preparations, and his role as the driving force and leader of the movement to remove Hitler and his regime."

Professor David Stafford, of Edinburgh University's Centre for Second World War Studies, said: "The timing is very significant. It was after the great defeats of 1943 and the German Army knew the writing was on the wall. It is fascinating that we are still learning new things about the Second World War."

Stauffenberg was executed for his role in the July 1944 attempt to kill Hitler, and Tresckow killed himself with a grenade because he feared being tracked down. Bussche - the only one of the three who was meant to die in the plots - survived the war and died in 1993.



The full article contains 946 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 21 April 2007 8:08 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: World War II
 
1

Skirvy,

Auld Reek 22/04/2007 00:54:03

Bit late to announce it now then.

2

James Donald,

Edinburgh 22/04/2007 01:22:36

Since the Allies had already decided to accept nothing less than unconditional surrender, there was no guarentee that the removal of Hitler would have resulted in the end of the war in Europe. If anything it was have prolonged the war as the German war effort may have become more efficient free from Hitler's influence.

3

,

22/04/2007 06:42:17
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason: Scotsman Import, Original comment id: 549916, Article id was mapped to record!
4

Conan,

Here 22/04/2007 06:45:55

#2, you are entirely correct in that the 'removal' of herr hitler certainly would not have ended WW2, indeed, it may have extended it by putting in place someone with some military and strategic skill, instead of the nutter (Hitler) who was running the show. The time to have gotten rid of Hitler was in 1936-39, before the fun started. This was done recently with 'Saddam' and now Iraq is no threat to anyone - although it is a bit of an internal mess right now, and is likely to remain that way until the logical partition of the country into its natural constituencies is carried out - which should have been 'job one' the day that 'major combat operations were over' ..... but, that's another story still unfolding.

5

Porry,

Lower Saxony 22/04/2007 06:54:20

This is nothing new. I read about this plot years ago. One little correction though: The 'Wolf's Lair' ("Wolfsschanze") near what used to be Rastenburg is not in the Russian Kaliningrad District of former East Prussia (Ostpreußen), but in the southern part of the Prussian province which is now a part of Poland.

6

MickyFinn,

Central Scotland 22/04/2007 06:56:22

Hitler is classed as a nutter, funny how he managed to convince a nation which was very much at the forefront of the early 20th century to sell its soul. perhaps if the 'nutters' in Britian hadn't along with the allies worked it up the Germans after WW1 Hitler wouldn't have been able to promote his dreams for the Reich etc. Remember the British empire has a lot to answer to and it's the victors that rewrite history to their advantage!

7

Dr. James Wilkie,

22/04/2007 07:46:35

It is difficult for outsiders and the following generation to appreciate what a gigantic and virtually unstoppable machine Hitler's Third Reich was. Opposition was nearly impossible and was strangled at birth. One of the Wehrmacht generals who was present at the top-level strategic conference before the invasion of Russia, Operation Barbarossa, gave me a graphic description of the scene there.

These men, Gerrmany's highest military elite, were stripped of their side arms, including even their ceremonial daggers, before entering the room. The walls were lined by poker-faced, armed members of the Leibstandarte-SS, Hitler's personal bodyguard, who registered every flicker of expression on their faces.

When Hitler entered and issued the orders for the liquidation of the Soviet commissars and Jews, there was a hiss of indrawn breath, but nobody dared to stand up and confront him. After the end of the meeting there was an angry storm up to the general staff chiefs Halder and von Brauchitsch on the dais, fists were thumped on the table, with protests this this was monstrous and inconsistent with the honour of German officers. Whereupon they were told to calm down and everything would be all right on the day.

Which of course it was - up to a point. The dirty work was - mostly but not entirely - done by the SS, SD and Gestapo, with the Wehrmacht on the whole left to do the fighting. The incident does, however, illustrate the absolute command that Hitler had over the military leadership, a command that he maintained right up to the end in the charnel house in Berlin in April 1945. The film Der Untergang (I don't know the English title) is a brilliant reconstruction of his final days that shows how subservient the military leaders were right to the end. The conspirators were brave men, but the obstacles they had to surmount would have demanded superhuman capabilities.

8

Boedica,

22/04/2007 07:48:00

#4 Conan - in 1936-39, however, the Western leaders, first and foremost Winston Churchill, still saw Hitler as their hatchet man who would rid them of Bolshevism.

9

fimo,

22/04/2007 07:53:39

MickycFinn: Have to agree with you. Hitler took a bankrupt country and made it into a super power within a couple of years. Meanwhile, Chamberlain and his colleagues just turned a blind eye and hoped the problem would go away. We were lucky that people like Churchill and R Mitchell (Spitfire designer) saw what was coming (but we still supplied Germany with Merlin engines so they could fine tune what was to become the Messerschmitt 109). Britain should have been in a position to prevent the war: but when it happened, we could do nothing to stop the advance of Hitler’s troops.

10

James Donald,

Edinburgh 22/04/2007 08:50:50

#5. Porry, Lower Saxony - Well spotted. Rastenburg or Ketrzyn as it is now called is part of Poland. Rather sloppy research from Murdo.....

11

Stouff,

Glasgow 22/04/2007 09:23:39

#5 I agree. This is nothing new. These plots and many others are detailed extensively along with a history of Baron Von Stauffenberg and his aristocratic family in the book 'Secret Germany - Claus Von Stauffenberg and the Mystical Crusade against Hitler' by Michael Baigent and Richard Leigh (Of 'Holy Blood, Holy Grail' fame. Presumably they couldn't resist the mention of Crusade in the title)
Baiscally, they tried everything to kill Hitler, and failed. So much for teutonic efficiency, eh?

12

Goat Boy,

22/04/2007 09:48:41

"...when Hollywood actor Tom Cruise begins shooting a major movie in which he plays Stauffenberg." Top Gun meets Night of the Generals. I bet he succeeds this time. Tom Cruise always wins. (Does he know he needs to loose an eye, a hand and couple of fingers?)

13

Firozali A.Mulla MBA PhD,

Dar-Es-Salaam Tanzania 22/04/2007 09:51:34

Hoffman, a world authority on wartime resistance to Hitler within the German army, believes another of the plotters was Colonel Claus von Stauffenberg, the man who earned his place in history by almost killing the Führer with a briefcase bomb in 1944.

Tell me sir.
Do your reporters eat lots of German shephard hot dogs.
The reason is simple. I have followed the JFK and Hitler from the time the first fat book came about. The Rise and The Fall of The Third Riech by William Shirer.
This is 1700 pages heavy reading not the me Tazan you Jane story. Similarly the JFK is too long story also and has no end. Hitler wanted to send all the Jews to the Isalnd of Madagascar and blast the island. This he could not do as the war torn Germany had few transprotation ship for this puopses. And the plot was discovered fast. He was having the meal and bombed. End.
Refer to Rise And Fall Of The Third Reich: Books: William L. Shirer by William L. Shirer.
The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich : A History of Nazi Germany: Books: William L. Shirer by William L. Shirer.
The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich by journalist William L. Shirer was the first definitive history of Nazi Germany in English. ...

14

Stouff,

Glasgow 22/04/2007 10:01:48

#7
Der Untergang means 'Downfall' which is the english title of the movie, based on the book by Joachim Fest. It's an excellent movie, harrowing in the extreme, but excellent performances. If it wasn't for the fact that he was portraying the most infamous character in history, I expect that Bruno Ganz may have at least been nominated for an oscar. It's a german movie, with English subtitles, but for anyone who is interested in that period of history, it's a must see.

15

fimo,

22/04/2007 10:21:20

The Hitler Book (the secret dossier prepared for Stalin) is also worth a read. It is based on the testimony of his two closest assistants. There are a couple of caveats, as it was written for Stalin and so it has been tweaked to ensure that he heard what he wanted to hear.

Correction to #9: The German Messerschmitt 109s were fitted with Rolls Royce Kestrel engines - not Merlin.

16

Porry,

22/04/2007 11:15:38

# 15, fimo, only the very first 1935 experimental version of the Me 109, the Me 109 V1, had a Rolls Royce 'Kestrel' II S engine. The experimental Me 109 V 13 of 1937 had a Daimler Benz 601 A. Later models, Me 109 A through D had Jumo (Junkers Motorenwerke) engines, and Me 109 E (1939) through K, as well as the model planned for aircraft carrier service (Me 109 K) had Daimler Benz engines again.

17

Porry,

Lower Saxony 22/04/2007 11:22:41

Sorry, a typo. The model for the never finished aircraft carrier "Graf Zeppelin" was, of course, the Me 109 T (not K).

18

Ian,

22/04/2007 11:59:59

Oh well - so long as Adolph and all of his top dogs were killed or caught and didn't make their escape to South America. Boys from Brazil could have been a lot nearer the truth than folk want to think.

19

Neil,

9% Growth Party 22/04/2007 12:39:34

Post war the German generals had a very strong incentive to prove both that they were always really getting ready to kill Hitler because they were secretly good liberal democrats & also that Hitler was a madman & had he stopped interfering they would have been well able to win the war for him.

20

Bikewoman,

22/04/2007 13:14:52

#14 Stouff

"If it wasn't for the fact that he was portraying the most infamous character in history, I expect that Bruno Ganz may have at least been nominated for an oscar."

Unfortunately the academy relegates foreign language pictures to the one category. They didn't nominate Bruno Ganz because they never consider foreign language pictures for any other category. Had they done so, he would have had a shot it it. He was splendid, as was Corinna Harfouch.

21

The Daleks,

22/04/2007 14:45:05

Blah, blah, blah.

Then Tresckow woke up, and realised it had all been a dream.

More bogus Hollywood style history.

At the end of the day, as the article suggests, this so-called story is nought but a trailer for another movie.

I'm still recovering from the historical innacuracies in Braveheart. I could be doing without any new fallacious history right now thanks, MGM!!

22

The Daleks,

22/04/2007 15:00:45

Dr Wilkie.

No offence, but if you're posting as an authoratative voice on what happened pre-Barbarossa, at least get some of the basic details right, such as the proper name of the SS unit guarding Adolf Hitler.

And, as for "poker faced".

If you've something of historical worth to say, do us a favour and leave out the melodrama.

23

The Daleks,

22/04/2007 15:06:07

Firozali.

Your stupid spoof is really boring now.

It's not big, it's not clever, and it's not funny.

Pack it in.

24

Porry,

Lower Saxony 22/04/2007 15:14:15

In the eyes of the 'Wehrmacht' generals it was not as easy as it seems to us today.
They had all been officers in the Kaiser's armed forces and were used to swearing an oath in which the Head of State was explicitely named. To them the 'Primacy of Politics', the right of the parliament and the government to make decisions which they as soldiers had to follow was nothing extra-ordinary. Therefore they did swear allegiance to Hitler when the new oath was introduced: "Before God I swear this holy oath that I will serve Adolf Hitler, the Leader of the German Reich and People, the Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces, in complete obedience and as a brave soldier will be ready to give my life at any time." Later, the putschists in the German forces discussed at great length whether or not it would be ethically justified to break one's oath, especially in times of war. Even after WW II, this led to discussions among ex-officers, particularly among those who thought of joining the new forces, the 'Bundeswehr' in 1955. Acceptance of the Stauffenberg putsch was one of the official touchstones for becoming a 'Bundeswehr' officer.

25

horatius,

London 22/04/2007 17:16:45

The allied policy of demanding unconditional surrender was questionable. For a start if it was such a good idea, why didn't the allies have it as a war aim from the start? It smacks of idealism rather than realism, which ought to be the guiding star in statesmanship. A policy of unconditional surrender might just have just have made sense while Hitler was alive, but it is hard to see how it would have been justified after Hitler had been assisinated by an anti-Nazi military government. I'm assuming the coup leaders would have put an immediate halt to the Holocaust and other atrocities.

Clearly the Allies would have had strong demands of Germany, given the devastation it had brought on its neighbours. I assume the bare minimum would be German withdrawal to its pre-war borders and repartions. The case for doing this by diplomacy was that Germany was still a formidable (if declining) power in late 1943 and it would have saved many millions of lives (both of Jews, other civilians and soldiers on both sides) if the war could have been halted immediately.

I'm not suggesting any kind of softness, just simply that given the coup members were both anti-nazi and had risked their lives, some sort of recognition would have been given for that and that recognition would have been given to the chance to obviate another 18 months of death and destruction.

26

Shuggie,

Canada 22/04/2007 17:58:28

I once knew an ex-SS Foreign Legionaire who maintained that "we would have won if we had got rid of Hitler in 1943."

27

Dr. James Wilkie,

22/04/2007 19:33:53

#23 It is well over two decades since my conversation with the late General Bornemann on this topic, but as far as I recollect I have the facts right. Hitler's bodyguard was commanded by General Sepp Dietrich, his old comrade from his Munich days. If you had ever met anyone who had to do with it (I have) you would know that "poker-faced" is by no means melodramatic, but an accurate description of a military unit that had been drilled beyond fanaticism to the status of a killing machine that did not permit the slightest display of emotion.

Lastly, I am not putting myself forward as an authority on this or any other topic, but I certainly take it amiss when aspersions are cast on what is nothing more than a factual rendering of information that was given to me by a first-hand witness, and declared to be such. In the course of my professional work over several decades I have come into contact with a fair number of prominent people and historical eye-witnesses, including several who knew Adolf Hitler personally. I don't need to prove anything by inventing stories.

28

Covert Action,

22/04/2007 20:22:16

#14 - Idiot. If you had read the letter of #7 I think it is clear he wasn't speaking to the German General in sign language. I doubt that he needs much lecturing in the German language from you.

#23 - pray tell us what exactly was the name of the bodyguard? Leibstandarte Adolf Hitler? You nit-picking a@@e.

29

James Donald,

Edinburgh 22/04/2007 20:23:42

#28. Dr. James Wilkie - "poker-faced" is by no means melodramatic, but an accurate description of a military unit that had been drilled beyond fanaticism to the status of a killing machine that did not permit the slightest display of emotion".
I have met plenty of guys from the Leibstandarte, including one not 5 miles from my house and your description is far fro accurate and simply a sweeping, generalised stereotype.
As you have come into contact with "a number of prominent people and historical eye-witnesses, including several who knew Adolf Hitler personally" you must realise that some are not above distorting the facts themselves. Perhaps you have met Otto Guensche and Rochus Misch, both from the Fuehrerbegleitkommando (part of the Leibstandarte) - if so, did you consider them poker-faced fanatical killing machines?

30

Porry,

Lower Saxony 22/04/2007 20:37:21

Well, Dr Wilkie (are you American because of the way you write abbreviations?) your account sounds a little melodramatic, even though it may be your witnesses who are responssible for it. Who was your General Bornemann, Generalleutnant Karl Bornemann, an Austrian like Hitler himself?

31

Goat Boy,

22/04/2007 21:22:20

Shuggie:

"I once knew an ex-SS Foreign Legionaire" - and you lived to tell the tale! What a dude.

32

Graeme M,

Australia 22/04/2007 23:22:26

Mickey Finn No 3 quoted;
Hitler is classed as a nutter, funny how he managed to convince a nation which was very much at the forefront of the early 20th century to sell its soul. perhaps if the 'nutters' in Britian hadn't along with the allies worked it up the Germans after WW1 Hitler wouldn't have been able to promote his dreams for the Reich etc.

Well Mickey, we have such three today, their names are Bush, Blair, and Howard...What else is new?...

33

Dr. James Wilkie,

22/04/2007 23:23:08

#30 You evidently did not meet the Leibstandarte as a body during their period of service, when your impressions might have been somewhat different. After the war they were individual people again. The group personality was a different thing altogether. No, I never met Günsche oder Misch, both of whom as far as I recollect had individual functions in Hitler's immediate entourage, like the others shown in the film. I am well aware of the propensity of all such people to whitewash their own actions after the war but, as I stated, I only gave the story as it was told to me, and I made that clear.

#31 General Bornemann was indeed an Austrian, one of the regular officers who were absorbed by the Wehrmacht after Hitler's takeover of Austria in 1938. No, I am not American; I am a Scot, but I have worked for many years in Europe, and also other parts of the world for the United Nations. So you are a Saxon. I spent a week in Dresden with a delegation earlier this month, and went cruising on the Elbe in a 110-year-old paddle steamer. Delightful part of the world.

34

James Donald,

Edinburgh 23/04/2007 00:13:49

#34. Dr. James Wilkie - "You evidently did not meet the Leibstandarte as a body during their period of service" and presumably neither did you. At its peak it was a Division of nearly 20,000 men so I can only go by what survivors have told me it was like to serve in this formation. Guensche was Hitler's adjutant and Misch a telephonist/signaler both in the Fuehrerbegleitkommando, however both also had front line experience as soldiers.
After the war, Wehrmacht officers were sometimes not above portraying the Waffen-SS in a bad light in contrast to their attitude during the war when they were glad to have such reliable units to call upon. Perhaps your General Bornemann was of this ilk.

35

Cyril,

New Zealand 23/04/2007 01:21:18

I remember when in England before the WW2 many people were praising the work of Adolf Hitler and the changes he was making for Germany

36

Porry,

Lower Saxony 23/04/2007 06:59:01

#34 - Regarding Lieutenant General Bornemann, that's what I thought. I am happy to hear that you enjoyed your visit to the Free State of Saxony. However, the German State of Lower Saxony does not have to do anything with Saxony. Lower Saxony with its capital Han(n)over is the area part of the Anglo-Saxons came from and that - much later - was the home of the Georges who once ruled Britain.

37

Porry,

Lower Saxony 23/04/2007 07:06:53

Oh, by the way, what is wrong with the 'military poker face'? Look at George Bush's honour guards at the White House in Washington, D.C., at the Horse Guards on horseback in Whitehall or any other military guard anywhere in the world. Well, the GI's on guard at base gates in the US may be (secretly) chewing gum...

38

Dr. James Wilkie,

23/04/2007 07:58:21

#37 Apologies for my geographical faux pas. I actually know that there are two Saxonies, but the hospitality in Dresden was rather overwhelming!

Incidentally, another of my former contacts was the small businessman in Bad Ischl, in Upper Austria, who built the tiled stoves for Hitler's Berghof villa near Berchtesgaden. The anecdotes of his conversations with Hitler on issues of the day were highly interesting, but I doubt if I could remember them with the accuracy that these columns evidently demand...

39

Porry,

Lower Saxony 23/04/2007 08:30:00

#39 - Sorry for sounding too picky, especially since I'm neither a Saxon nor a Lower Saxon. I just happen to live here.

40

freeyourmediums,

Los Angeles, CA. 07/01/2009 12:44:15
Please. Hitler was an actor with the required stage presence and auditory skills, and not that impressive acting skills either. The educated wealthy run things. We all know this. When is the last time any of you even heard of the elite allowing a homeless, uneducated nut-job (Hitler) to rise to power unless as their puppet and fall guy? Never. Laughable. Hitler was just an errand boy delivering messages for those responsible who were hiding behind him. This was then and now no great secret. STOP pretending. Instead why not research and publish the Bush dynasty connections of WWII Germany. That German dynasty is still alive and well, just like the Bush's. Who is taking payoffs from that German dynasty to keep the truth buried regarding their identity? Hitler. Ha! If it weren't so sad it would be laughable. Thanks, FreeYourMediums

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Is the government right to continue with its policy of cutting down quangos?
No, I think their independence means we get a better job
Yes, they are unaccountable and expensive
Only if their work is duplicated or plainly redundant

Web Links:

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.