Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

The hunt is On.
Sponsored by
Can you track down Scotland's wildest beastie?

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Take an Ike: allies fight wind farm threat at Scottish White House



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
10 September 2006
IT MAY not rank with the liberation of Europe, but it is a battle of which the Supreme Allied Commander would have been proud.
The granddaughter of General Dwight D Eisenhower, who led the allied forces to victory in the Second World War, has linked up with the National Trust for Scotland to see off a serious threat to the landscape around the castle that became his Scottish
home.

A wind farm company has submitted plans to build 15 turbines on the hill that overlooks Culzean Castle, the 18th-century Robert Adam masterpiece owned by the trust on the Ayrshire coast.

Its magnificent top-floor apartment was given by its former owner to Eisenhower at the end of the war to thank the US general for the part he played in commanding Scottish troops and defeating the Nazi menace.

But, taking a leaf from the book of one of the greatest leaders in modern history, the NTS and Susan Eisenhower - along with Historic Scotland and Scottish Natural Heritage - have formed an alliance to stop the wind farm plan in its tracks.

The trust claims the £20m development on Knoweside Hill with turbines more than 250ft high - higher than the Wallace Monument - threatens to destroy the views from one of Scotland's most famous castles and has lodged a formal protest with the planning authority, South Ayrshire Council.

Eisenhower, head of Washington's Eisenhower Institute, a policy think-tank, and a highly regarded authority on foreign policy and security issues, said: "I absolutely support what the NTS are doing.

"There are many places where wind farms can be built, but there is only one Culzean Castle with its magnificent sweep of views."

Eisenhower said she still regularly visited the castle and "cared very much" for the property given to her grandfather. "My grandfather loved Culzean Castle and it was the last place he painted before he died," she said.

"This is a place enjoyed by thousands of Scots and overseas visitors every year and the setting is absolutely irreplaceable. This is the NTS's flagship in Scotland and it should be protected."

Michael Hunter, NTS's west region director, said building a wind farm so close to Culzean was "unacceptable" because of its effect on the landscape around the building designed by Robert Adam in the late 18th century.

"This is the first time the trust has objected to a wind farm, as we generally support renewable energy developments. However, we are strongly opposed to this development because of the damage it will cause to one of Scotland's most significant heritage sites," he said.

The trust welcomed more than 200,000 visitors a year to the castle and the country park, Hunter added. "They come to enjoy the beautiful and historic surroundings Culzean is famous for, and the proposed wind farm could seriously harm tourism, not just at Culzean but in Ayrshire as a whole.

"The scale and strikingly artificial appearance of the turbines would make them a highly undesirable feature in these views, at odds with the spirit of the place and damaging to the nationally significant qualities of the designed landscape."

The second front against the plans has been opened up by Historic Scotland, the government's heritage agency, which says the picturesque setting of the internationally important castle by Robert Adam is of "paramount importance".

It says it is lodging a formal objection because the turbines would spoil views from both the Eisenhower Suite and other rooms within the castle and from the landscaped grounds.

"Knoweside Hill is highly visible on the horizon in views from some of the principal rooms of the castle," it says. "The wind farm will therefore have significant adverse impact on views from the castle" as well as "from formal lawns immediately to the south of the house".

The third prong of the alliance is Scottish Natural Heritage, the government's countryside advisers. SNH says the wind farm will have a significant impact on the natural heritage of the Culzean Castle landscape.

The proposal involves the construction and operation of 15 wind turbines, large areas of concrete to support them, an electricity substation and 3.5km of associated access tracks in an area of 310 hectares on Knoweside Hill - three miles to the north of Culzean Castle, near Maybole. The land is owned by the trustees of the Cassillis and Culzean Estate, formerly owned by the Marquess of Ailsa, who stand to make millions of pounds if the project goes ahead.

The wind farm developers, the County Durham-based Banks Group, claim views of the turbines from the castle and grounds are "limited" and that local communities will benefit to the tune of £500,000 for community projects over the farm's 25-year lifespan.

Phil Dyke, the renewable energy director at Banks Developments, said: "We are aware that there are some concerns about our proposals and we have met with these organisations to discuss them in detail. Last week we submitted a detailed report to South Ayrshire Council, which addresses all the issues expressed to date."

Dyke said the company had received "a great deal of local encouragement" for the proposals. "Both Dunure Community Association and Maybole Town Council are supporting the scheme, as they are able to see the benefits that a renewable energy project will bring to their community," he said.

"We are now working with local groups to identify specific projects that would bring real benefits to the North Carrick area." Given the strength of the official opposition, the Knoweside Hill proposal is expected to be 'called in' for a decision by Scottish Executive ministers.

After a series of complaints by local residents, community groups and national agencies such as SNH about the over-proliferation of wind farms, the Executive has instructed planning authorities to take more care about siting turbines in areas of high scenic or heritage value.

Signs of a tougher line emerged on Friday when, despite the Executive's aim to produce 40% of Scotland's electricity from renewable energy sources by 2020, deputy enterprise minister Allan Wilson refused permission for a 24-turbine wind farm near Crieff in Perthshire, to preserve the area's "natural beauty".

THE PRESIDENT'S RETREAT


ROBERT Adam converted an old fortified towerhouse with dramatic views across to Arran between 1777 and 1792 for David Kennedy, the 10th Earl of Cassillis, creating what is probably the finest Georgian castle in Scotland. The Circular Saloon and Oval Staircase at Culzean are acknowledged as Adam’s final masterpieces. When the Kennedy family donated the castle to the National Trust for Scotland in 1945, they asked

that the top floor be given to Eisenhower as a thank you from the people of Scotland. Eisenhower, nicknamed Ike, first came to Culzean in 1946 and was clearly touched to accept this gift. He visited the castle three more times, once as the 34th president of the United States when, for a short while, Culzean was his Scottish White House. His longest stay was during his retirement, when he enjoyed painting and walking in the quiet

of Culzean’s gardens, woodland and shore. He wrote of Culzean: “ This is a place I can relax.” Today, his six- bedroom home, arranged around the Oval Staircase, is one of the trust’s most popular holiday lets, with a double room available from £ 225 per night. The Eisenhower Suite is virtually a self- contained country house hotel, enjoying spectacular views across the Firth of Clyde to the mountains of Arran and Mull of Kintyre.



The full article contains 1284 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

Gnasher,

10/09/2006 09:26:03

Right. I've had enough of this nonsense. The fact that a Dead President once stayed at a bed & breakfast is no reason for not putting up windmills on the nearby hills. People need to get used to the fact that this country is going to diversify the way that it generates energy and is moving away from sole dependence on nuclear and fossil fuels. Windmills are beautiful and I honestly don't care that they might be partly visible from the "formal lawns" of the B&B. Let's tell the NTS to go and boil their heads.

2

John,

10/09/2006 09:30:57

Nev is quite right.

Windmills are much more visually attractive than all that boring old scenery that you get everywhere else in rural Scotland.

One bit of greenery looks very much like another.

3

Cadgers,

10/09/2006 09:47:39

#1 & #2....Don't you think these 'pretty windmills' will discourage tourists? After all they come for the 'greenery'.

4

Jeeemy,

Scotland 10/09/2006 10:20:35

Has enyone ever gone to see one of these windfarms closeup, nevermind from a distance?
The "noise" argument is totally over-rated.
As is also the "landscape" surounding the castle. The landscape is a bowl of a broad mix and this proposal would add to and not remove from the area in question.
Had some of these objectors been arround Adam would not have been allowed to build it in the first place, never mind the puffers beaching to off load the coal for the gas works.

5

wayne bijlyeerheid,

10/09/2006 10:27:13

The whole windmill thing is nothing but a scam.
The amount of energy they produce is next to useless in the real world, and what they do produce is subsidised to the hilt by tax pounds.

Once again, it's Scotland's environment and quality of life that is to be paid for the peace of mind of airheads who think the world can be run on wind and light, if it ran on wind and p*sh maybe turbine advocates would be of use in the chain of production.

6

John,

10/09/2006 12:14:52

Pat: Anything that discourages tourists is a good thing!

7

Neil,

Glasgow 10/09/2006 12:36:32

Absolutely John. Get rid of all tourists let them just send us their money. Get rid of all serious (ie nuclear) electricity generation too - just let the English produce it & send it to us. While we are at it lets get rid of the 46% of our economy that isn't government spending after all Westminster puts up the money under Barnett anyway.

Scotland used once to be proud of being the world's greatest manufacturing centre but now our political class want us to be nothing but subsidy junkies. Its demeaning.

8

John A Douglas,

Lochwinnoch 10/09/2006 19:47:50

Like William, No 5, wind turbines don't work. We are being hoodwinked by the development companies and our politicians have swallowed everything - hook, line and sinker. They just don't work. Not one fossil fuelled power station will shut down, no matter how many turbines are erected, as the power stations are required to provide back up to the wind generators which wont produce electricity with winds below 5 mph and over 50 mph. Further because the base stations have to run below efficiency to meet the wind turbines needs, they consequently produce more CO2, than would otherwise be the case.
When one takes into consideration the manufacture, transportation, erection and de-commissioning of wind turbines they also compare unfavourably with other forms of electricity production.
Many of the wind turbines being erected are on areas of peat, one of nature's means of actually absorbing carbon. So again, wind is actually helping to destroy, that which they are supposed to be protecting. In Co. Galway, there have also been horrific avalanches of peat with terrible consequences to the local community, all due wind turbine erection.
Without the market in renewal obligation certificates wind turbine developments wouldn't happen, yet this is actually having the effect of increasing the cost of our electricity and having adverse effects on the poor and driving them into fuel poverty.
I say again, these monstrosities just don't work and are destroying our countryside for absolutely no logical reason and no benefits in our struggle to reduce carbon emissions.

9

Mike Martin,

Bridge of Don 10/09/2006 21:25:37

I object to non-UK nationals such as Donald Trump and Ms Eisenhower attempting to dictate UK energy policy. I also disagree with Mr Douglas with his unsubstantiated assertions. There is an abundance of wind especially in Scotland and often the wind blows for days on end. It would be easy to store some of the energy for later use during calm periods by employing one of the many storage technologies available e.g. metal hydrides, producing hydrogen via electrolysis, pumping water uphill into reservoirs, pneumatic accumulators etc.. Wind farms do not rely on inputs such as gas or uranium which have to be imported and whose price is rising steeply. Moreover they do not produce nasty waste as does nuclear or CO2 as do coal and gas power stations. We have to exploit renewables for the sake of future generations.

10

Harbinger,

Wales 11/09/2006 11:09:23

Mike (9) The naivety of wind turbine supporters never ceases to amaze me. The wind blows therefore it's free! Excellent summary of the situation by John Douglas.

The Cost of Generating Electricity: A study carried out by PB Power for The Royal Academy of Engineering, 2003
"The fundamental problem with the supply to, and demand for, electricity is that it cannot be stored. Once generated, electricity must be delivered and consumed immediately owing to technical difficulties with, and the prohibitively high cost of, storage. In this regard, electricity is perhaps a unique commodity in that the rate of its production must balance the rate with which it is consumed at all times."

"Within the study, the ‘cost of generating electricity’ is deemed to refer to that of providing a dependable (or ‘firm’) supply. For intermittent sources of generation, such as wind, an additional amount has been included for the provision of adequate standby generation."

Batteries are OK for torches but for power stations?

11

Mike Martin,

Bridge of Don 11/09/2006 17:33:37

Dennis (11). Hmmm... so I'm naive? I detect an anti-wind farm zealot losing the argument. Energy storage methods have been around for decades. The grid is very efficient at moving electricy around the country and the wind is always blowing in some part of the country. Renewable energy systems are much easier to optimise than nuclear with all its incalculable risks. We need to break out out of the institutional myopia that dogs this country and ambitiously pursue renewables. Climatic change and insecure supply of uranium and gas are pressing issues which only renewable energy systems can address.

12

Coutts,

Knoweside 11/09/2006 18:11:06

Siting a wind farm overlooking Culzean Castle would be totally inappropriate. Culzean Castle was gifted to The National Trust to be protected and sustained for the Nation. Over 200,000 visitors every year agree.

Susan Eisenhower's support is greatly welcomed.

Although the developers state that there is local support for the development this is far from true.
There is strong local opposition to this development from many people who value the landscapes of Culzean and Turnberry. The Town Council in Maybole and Dunure Community Association are isolated in their support, which sadly seems to have been directly influenced by the promise of cash if the project goes ahead.

When will the people who support onshore wind turbines do their homework? In the future when their energy bills are much, much higher and people cannot afford to heat their homes will they still advocate this method of energy production?
Denmark and Germany have already found to their cost that wind turbines do not reduce CO2 emissions significantly.

Trying to combat global warming with onshore developments like this will leave us all in the dark and those who support it will be vilified by future generations.

13

Gordon48,

Livingston 12/09/2006 15:57:43

Mike (9)
The grid very efficient at moving electricity, energy storage methods efficient, don't think so! Do I detect a pro wind farm zealot

14

Joe,

USA 12/09/2006 16:50:11

Separate from the wind issue, how can a US General
accept a gift (house) from someone while
employed by the US Gov.?

15

Ivan the terrible,

15/09/2006 07:14:08

Not on My door step?
We should be reminding the Scottish Executive about their commitment to alternative resources regarding the generation of electricity, if not you are going to get a Nuclear Power Staton on our door step, here in East lothian we aready have one (Toress) an I for one do not want another.
If it is a case of not on my door step, lobby your M.P M.S.P. on this issue or S---- up

16

Coutts,

Knoweside 15/09/2006 18:00:52

Ivan the not so terrible.....People who support onshore wind are perhaps unaware that the most likely companion to wind turbines is nuclear. Wind farms are more likely to be further away from the main areas of power consumption and their intermittancy makes them unsuitable for base load generation. So new nuclear power stations are more likely to be sited closer to the main centres of population.

The Scottish Exec should listen to the scientists and engineers and not rely entirely on onshore windfarms to the detriment of all other renewable technologies. We need a mix. They should be investing in the development of more effective renewables, better public transport and energy conservation etc etc. As we have not invested enough for future energy needs the reality is this may include Nuclear. We also have Hunterston in Ayrshire on our doorstep.

Wind farms won't just be on a few rural doorsteps, they may be on everyones doorstep. CO2 emissions will still increase as they have in Denmark and Germany after having windfarms for years - they've now put a halt to more turbines.

Putting wind farms in totally unsuitable locations will be political suicide for Jack McConnell.

17

famous 15,

Edinburgh 16/09/2006 11:13:09

I used to visit the English Lake district and they put up windmills. The beauty was destroyed. I no longer visit there. That is my choice. Do what you wish but if the beauty is gone, so am I.

18

Elizabeth M,

Scotland 16/09/2006 21:08:44

Number 9 - FYI - Donald Trump's Mother is Scottish as is the Mother of Bill Gates. Did y'ken that????


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Is the government right to continue with its policy of cutting down quangos?
No, I think their independence means we get a better job
Yes, they are unaccountable and expensive
Only if their work is duplicated or plainly redundant

Web Links:

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.